SEO
Managed SEO
Technical, content, links and local work in one monthly plan, reported in figures you can verify yourself.
London SEO AgencyTower 42, 25 Old Broad Street, EC2N 1HNby appointment
+44 7435 755127Edition updated
SEO
Local & Maps
Websites & CRO
Growth
From the results
Boroughs A to L
Boroughs M to W
Industries
Services · AI search
7 deliverables · 5 steps
Entity and schema work, pages written to be cited, an llms.txt file, and a fixed set of questions asked every month in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google’s AI results, so you can see how AI search describes your London business and whether it is changing. Nobody can guarantee a citation, and we say so.
Who it is for
3 London scenarios
AI search optimisation is for a London business whose customers have started asking an assistant instead of typing a search. The question is no longer only "do we rank" but "when someone asks ChatGPT, Gemini or Google’s AI Mode about what we do, are we named, and is what it says true?" For most businesses the answer today is "not named" or "named with facts from three years ago", and nobody has checked.
It is not right for you if your site does not yet rank for anything, because AI engines draw heavily on the same index and the same signals ordinary search uses; the foundations in managed SEO come first and this work rides on them. It is also not for you if you want a guaranteed mention. No one can promise what an AI assistant will say, and anyone who does is selling you something else.
Deliverables
7 listed
Process
5 steps
The questions your customers ask, run in each engine and captured with dates. We agree the list with you so nobody can move the goalposts later.
One consistent version of your business across the site and every public source an engine reads, with structured data that matches the visible page.
The pages that answer the tracked questions rewritten or created: plain answers, sourced figures, named authors, dates, HTML not PDF.
Server rendering checked, llms.txt published, AI crawler access decided with you and written into robots.txt.
The baseline re-run every month. What moved is reported with the screenshots; what did not is the next month's work.
In detail
Edition updated 9 Oct 2026
It helps to be clear about what these engines do. When you ask ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini a question about a London business, the assistant usually runs a search, reads a handful of pages it trusts, and writes an answer with citations. Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode do the same with Google’s own index. So the work that earns a citation is mostly the work that earns a ranking: a page that answers the question clearly, a business the engine can identify with confidence, and other sources that agree. Our guide to AI search and GEO explains the mechanics without the jargon, and the AI Overviews guide covers what changes for a London business specifically.
The first job is the entity: can an engine tell, with confidence, who you are? We check every public description of your business for disagreements: the trading name against the legal name, the address on the site against Companies House and the Business Profile, the categories, the opening hours, the founders’ names, what you sell. Then we write structured data that describes exactly what is on each page, following the schema guide, and we work with you to fix the off-site sources that are wrong. An engine citing a directory for your prices is a sign the directory was easier to read than your site.
The second job is citable pages. An assistant quotes the page that gives the plainest answer with the least effort: a definition in the first paragraph, a price stated as a price, a figure with its source, a named author and a date, and HTML rather than a PDF or an image of a menu. We rewrite the pages that answer the tracked questions, and create the ones that are missing. The third job is access: pages rendered on the server, an llms.txt file describing the site, and a decision, made with you and written into robots.txt, about which AI crawlers may read it. We will be honest that llms.txt is a convention, not a standard any engine has committed to; it costs almost nothing to publish, so we publish one (this site has one), and we do not claim more for it than that.
Who does it: Muhammad Ali, our SEO Specialist, leads the work. Ayesha Jahangir, Generative AI Expert, and Thomas Edward Bennett, AI Content and Automation Specialist, run the baseline and the monthly captures with him. Momna Imran, Communications and Audit, keeps every recommendation grounded in evidence you can inspect. The whole team is named and pictured.
Technical fixes are usually re-crawled within two to eight weeks. Local search changes often show within one to three months. Competitive London head terms usually take six to twelve months. These are typical ranges from our own work, not a promise for your site, and we report progress every month so you can see which it is.
AI answers add their own uncertainty. The same question asked twice can produce two different answers, so we never judge a single capture; we track the trend across months on a fixed list of questions. Entity fixes and structured data tend to be reflected within the two-to-eight-week re-crawl window in Google’s results and within weeks in assistants that search live. Becoming the cited source for a competitive question takes as long as ranking for it, usually months, because it depends on the same authority. We report what moved, with the screenshots, and we say when something has not moved.
What we report: the share of tracked questions in which you are named, per engine; the accuracy of what is said (facts right, facts wrong, facts missing); the sources each engine cites for you and for the two nearest competitors; referral visits from AI assistants in GA4, by source; and the ordinary Search Console figures for the pages we changed. Where it comes from: dated, screenshotted captures we run by hand, GA4 and Search Console in accounts you own. How often: monthly, as a section of the standard report, with a review every quarter.
What we do not report: an "AI visibility score" from a tool with no stated method, or a share of Google impressions attributed to AI Overviews, because Search Console does not separate them and we will not pretend it does. If an engine your customers do not use starts naming you, we will mention it, but we will not count it as a result.
Nothing. The free SEO audit is a written review of your site by an SEO specialist from the team, delivered within two working days of your request. For this service we add one thing: we ask two assistants five of the questions your customers would ask and show you what they say about you today, with the pages they cited. It is often the most useful page in the review, because nobody has looked before.
AI search work is included in the higher managed SEO tiers and can be bought as a standalone project (baseline, entity and schema fixes, the first set of citable pages). What drives the price is the number of questions tracked, the number of pages that need rewriting, how many off-site sources need correcting, and whether we ship the technical changes or your developers do. Pricing is published on the pricing page; our terms are on the before you sign page.
This work sits on top of ordinary search. The crawl, rendering and speed fixes in technical SEO decide whether an engine can read you at all. The citable pages are content work with a stricter brief. The reviews and listings that corroborate your site are reputation management, and the press and mentions that engines weigh heavily are digital PR. On every managed retainer we baseline how AI engines describe you as a matter of course, because the work that earns a citation is the same work that earns a ranking.
We have not yet published an AI search case study. The field is new, the measurement is by hand, and we will publish a case only when a client agrees and every figure in it can be sourced to a dated capture. Until then the proof is the method on this page and the baseline we show you in the review. Ask us for a reference call; every case we publish names the client, the figure, the source and the date.
Get your free SEO auditA person reviews your site within two working days. Three fields, no call required.
Results ledger
No AI search optimisation case published yet
We have not yet published a AI search optimisation case study, and we would rather say so than borrow a case from another service and call it proof. Ask us for a reference call instead.
The desk
21 people, named · 220 experts across the group
Specialists across the group contribute where a brief needs them, and you deal with one named account lead throughout.
5 pages
SEO
Technical, content, links and local work in one monthly plan, reported in figures you can verify yourself.
SEO
Service pages, location pages, guides and product copy, briefed from search data and written to be read.
SEO
Crawl, indexing, Core Web Vitals, structured data and migrations, fixed by developers who ship code.
Local & Maps
Review generation, monitoring and replies on Google, TripAdvisor, Trustpilot and sector sites, within the rules.
SEO
Earned links from coverage, partners and the London press, reported link by link, never bought.
Questions
9 questions
Free SEO audit
In writing · within 2 working days
Send the address. A person reads it and replies within two working days with what holds you back in London search and the three fixes that matter most. No automated score, no call required first.
Reviewed by hand by our SEO specialist. You get their name the same working day.
Mon to Fri, 09:00 to 18:00 · +44 7435 755127
Not ready to talk? Score your own site in five minutes